Saturday, April 19, 2008

1989 Chevy 4x4 Problems






XENOBIOTIC:

discover that plastic food containers and bottles, they release a potentially dangerous to health.


By: Lionel Perez Valenzuela

What are xenobiotics?


originally called xenobiotics (xeno "strange," bio "life), the compounds synthesized in the laboratory and not found in nature. These compounds are generally very stable and non-polar, they tend to accumulate in the tissues of living organisms. Take a long time to degrade in natural systems and can act as pollutants.

are now referred to xenobiotic compounds both natural and synthetic, which are exposed and that our bodies metabolize and accumulate, their effects can be very dangerous to health. Xenobiotics are used in organic chemistry, generally in the industry, plastics, paints, food, medicine, fuel, cosmetics, cigarettes, packaging, etc.. That is, we are constantly exposed to them.

nonpolar compounds generally are lipophilic so, so cross biological membranes easily. . Thus they are unlikely to be excreted as they tend to accumulate in fat. Instead polar compounds can be filtered by the kidneys and excreted much more rapidly.

These xenobiotic compounds, can not be excreted in apolar form, so for disposal is required prior processing in more water-soluble metabolites (biotransformation or metabolism). These reactions of "detoxification" occur mainly in the REL, peroxisomes and mitochondria. In general detoxification reactions occur in two stages:

1 - oxidations, reductions and hydrolysis make the xenobiotic in a more polar metabolite
2 - Conjugation (covalent bond), the xenobiotic or its metabolite with an endogenous molecule polar, for facilitators elimination from the body.

Bisphenol A, a xenobiotic that mimics the action of estrogen.

Bisphenol A (BPA, for its acronym in English) is a component that can be found in all plastics. Initially synthesized in 1891, has been flying a key component in the synthesis of plastics from polycarbonate to polyester. In the U.S. alone produces more than one million tons per year of this compound.

Since 1936 it is known that BPA mimics the estrogen binding to the same receptors as the female steroid hormone. Experiments have shown that this compound may promote tumor cell growth of breast cancer and decrease the amount of sperm.

These findings have led many researchers to wonder about the risks posed to health from the massive use of these plastics that release BPA, especially when used at high temperatures (microwave, washing with hot water), or subjected to heavy use.

Center for Disease Control (CDC) of USA. samples found BPA in nearly all urine samples collected in 2004 in an effort to measure the prevalence (number of individuals in a group or population who have a particular characteristic or event) of various chemicals in the human body.

Studies suggest that BPA does not stay in the body than a few days because it is detoxified as a glucuronide (BPA is associated with glucuronic acid, an acid derivative of glucose), a soluble and easily excreted product. Despite this, the CDC has enontrado BPA-glucuronide in most urine samples, suggesting constant exposure to BPA.

BPA is used in tin cans as a lining to prevent corrosion and contamination of food. It is also used in plastic jars and bottles, so the polycarbonate is transparent and unbreakable. When these bottles and nipples hot water is added and then allowed to cool down the rate of BPA release of these containers increases 55 times.

Recent studies in the journal Reproductive Toxicology suggest that humans may have been exposed to ten times the levels of BPA, deemed safe by environmental enforcement agencies. If it is true that humans metabolize BPA more rapidly than rodents, as suggested by recent studies, then the daily exposure level must be higher to the levels found in human serum samples.

the CDC data have shown that 93% of 2,157 people aged six to eighty-five years show metabolic produce detectable BPA in their urine. The levels are higher in children than in adolescents and adolescents higher than in adults. It has also shown that BPA decreases fertility in female mice, the effects of BPA remain permanent, even after short periods of exposure. Also no need to stay in the body to take effect.

Children and babies more exposed to BPA

is to unborn babies and newborns, where researchers are more concerned, because BPA has been linked with breast cancer and prostate, diabetes and altered menstrual cycles in laboratory mice that were still developing.
Biologists Fred vom Saal and warn that children are exposed to BPA levels ten times higher than those needed to produce the animaels disorders. Especially since the polycarbonate bottles and cans of infant formula BPA freed.

The FDA (Federal Administration Drug USA), first approved by the BPA in 1963, and showed no harmful effects on health. When the U.S. Congress passed a new law in 1976 - The Minutes of Toxic Substances Control-ordering that EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), to conduct or verify safety studies on each new compound chemist before approval for use substances like BPA were already on the market. Despite this, if new evidence emerged about the dangers of BPA or other chemicals, may be new evidence. The problem is that FDA maintains that BPA is safe. Not only that, for the chemical industry, the BPA is not only safe but also very difficult to replace all of its properties: lightweight, unbreakable, inexpensive, and other features are difficult to match.

To further complicate the issue, BPA is not the only chemical compound that mimics the action of estrogens. For example, some compounds in antibacterial soaps, also interfere with hormonal signaling. How they might interact BPA and other chemicals estrogenomiméticos is not known.

Japan and Canada take measures against the use of BPA

Concern about BPA is worldwide and some countries have taken action long ago. In Japan the industry began to use natural resins in place of BPA, especially since Japanese cientiíicos since 1997 showed that BPA was released from polycarbonate bottles. A subsequent study in 1999 showed that levels of BPA in urine were significantly decreased.

Canada has taken the measure of recall of polycarbonate baby bottles, as we read this to
RTICLE the daily La Nación:


http://buscador.lanacion.com.ar/Nota.asp?nota_id = bpa = 1006109 & high



Meanwhile in our country, like in the U.S. is likely to take some time before these preventive measures are taken.

What security measures we take to protect our family?

not use bottles or containers made of polycarbonate, are generally transparent or colored and are marked with the number 7, at the base. Also limit or eliminate canned foods: canned, food, soups and infant formula. Can be replaced by similar products in other containers.

If they can not be replaced, never be used in a microwave or storing liquids or hot foods or hot water washing by hand or dishwasher.

You choose whether to use polycarbonate bottles, or old glass bottles. But remember that Bisphenol A is present in those plastic bottles, and a compound which is potentially very dangerous for health and development of babies.

Saturday, April 5, 2008

Babysitting Bath Stories

The venom of salt

[Nutrition]

Jorge Palafox:

Without salt there can be no life, however, doctors warn that heavy drinking is harmful health. What explains this paradox? Simply because the call table salt has little to do with the natural crystal salt. The "table salt is sodium chloride which in some cases add iodine and fluorine and, therefore, is not the kind of salt that your body needs. The natural crystal salt is composed of three or four elements of the table salt we use today but the 84 that make up our bodies and in the exact ratio.

What accounts for the salt, and its importance in ancient times was that which was used to pay soldiers, it is derived the word "salary" - today is considered the cause of such diverse pathologies that's why it is called, along with refined sugar, the "white poisons"? Understanding so great paradox? So our ancestors were wrong in their assessment? Absolutely. What happens is that the current table salt has nothing to do with the salt consumed in power then and only century and a half ago. What to eat today name of table salt is sodium chloride is sometimes added iodine and / or fluorine. The natural crystal salt, however, both that which comes from the sea and the mountains, contains the 84 elements composing the human body ... in exact proportion. Huge difference. Moreover, few people know that the composition of the blood flowing more than the 90,000 km our veins, arteries and capillaries, is almost identical to saline "sea primary", ie a solution with the same concentration of elements that had the sea millions of years ago, at the time that animal life left the water. To the extent that many researchers who have been denouncing for decades instead of blood transfusion-action-involves many risks today may be introduced into the patient who requires purified sea water instead of foreign blood. Of course that would not allow "business" that is present in human blood ...

PRODUCT OF IGNORANCE

And why the industry decided one day to change the natural crystal salt in simple sodium chloride? Because the content analysis of the time scientists said, the sufficiency which always accompanies ignorance in the field of knowledge- the other elements-containing minerals and other trace elements, were "impurities" unnecessary. And enough sodium chloride to salt food decided it was best to eliminate everything else. Suffice to say that any resemblance between the "salt" arising since then consume with food and natural salt is nonexistent. And a food that was "pure gold" because it provided human beings all the elements necessary for their survival in the exact proportion that the body needs it began to consume a product that is "pure poison", as you well know researchers and physicians, especially nutritionists and cardiologists.
And it's unfortunate that the toxicity sodium chloride must be added iodine and fluoride, minerals today is artificially added to salt. Iodine-toxic to the body as soon as it exceeds the minimum necessary, "adding it is supposed to improve thyroid function and fluorine-one of the most radioactive, because there is" good "for the teeth. Sarcasm. Not forgetting that table salt preservative whose statement on the packaging is not compulsory (calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate and so-called E-535, E-536, E-540, E-550, E-551, E-552, E-553b, E-570 and E-572 and aluminum hydroxide) to prevent salt from clumping. And by the way, as it should be mentioned remember that aluminum is a toxic metal that when consumed in excess is deposited in the nervous system and brain. In fact, many independent researchers who have been denouncing not heard who could be behind the increasingly high level of Alzheimer's sufferers in the West. In spite of this, aluminum is still used in most metal containers in which they now sell sodas, colas, soft drinks and beer. Why this silence?

SALT
TABLE IS TOXIC

Ultimately, Understand them well: sodium chloride, basic component refined table salt that most people consume, is a toxic substance that overloads the body so that it can, therefore, is preparing to eliminate as soon as possible. And perhaps you are thinking right now that is not appropriate because you do not put salt on the salad, fish or steak, but have you stopped to think that the vast majority of products are prepared salt as a preservative? Well aware that this is a serious problem because human beings are enough 0.2 grams a day to have an unmet need for salt and in the West the average daily consumption per person is between 12 and 20 grams ( intake 40 grams can hit even cause death.) Add to that the fact that our body is only able to remove between 5 and 7 grams of sodium chloride per day (depending on age, constitution and sex) and nobody was surprised that the organs of elimination of those who regularly eat table salt are constantly overworked.
Obviously, sodium is a mineral vital to us. Without it no life is possible as it is in the fluid that bathes the cells. What happens is that the potassium balance is essential and if broken can lead to many diseases, including cardiovascular, kidney, the liver and, of course, hypertension. And the only way to control this balance security is restricting or eliminating the consumption of table salt, as it explains José Antonio Campoy in his book The ultimate diet.
Logically, then, our body tries to protect itself from the overload. How? Well hydrated. The problem is that this body needs 23 grams of "water" for each gram of sodium chloride is not able to drive ... but "water cell." That is, the body is forced to sacrifice the water from cells to avoid the negative effect of sodium chloride. And that makes millions of cells die dehydrated thus further dead tissue forms must also be removed. That is why excessive consumption of "table salt" causes the formation of tissue edema and excess aqueous acid, and therefore also the excess table salt is the cause of cellulite (which explains why people who do not suffer fat eating just suffer this problem or are obese).
But there's more: when consumption is excessive there comes a time in which the body can no longer dedicate to the work of more water detox cell and use another way to solve the problem: the crystallization of bones and joints. To this end, the amino acids bind animal with sodium chloride and deposited shaped crystals of uric acid leading to the formation of kidney and bladder stones as well as arthritis, osteoarthritis and rheumatic diseases.

SALT IS ESSENTIAL FOR LIFE

arrived
this point we must make it clear that natural salt is not only negative but absolutely essential for life. Everything we've discussed so far relates to refined table salt that we have become accustomed to eating and sold massively. A "salt" that contains only sodium chloride and iodine as well and fluorine-these two minerals in the cases where the "rich" with them. Minerals that are not also in the natural rate should be, as in the case of blood, and whose frequencies are not correct because their structures have been altered in the process of industrial handling.
fact, is that most people have a genuine lack of salt, even those that are loaded with sodium chloride. Of the salt that contains the 84 elements that make up our bodies in a specific ratio and whose frequencies are not affected because they belong to the natural geometric structure of the salt without manipulation, on the other hand, is what allows us to get her vital energy.

THE ORIGIN OF SALT

As the reader knows, the salt can be obtained from sea or land salt mines. The problem is that today's seas and oceans have a high level of pollution, especially due to petroleum hydrocarbons and accumulation of heavy metals like mercury, lead, cadmium and arsenic, among others. Toxic to make sea salt, even though much better than refined table salt, no longer has the same positive effect that was yesteryear. In fact, the only complete pure salt and Earth is now only in the places where millions of years ago the seas dried up "primary landmine. They are the only salt that contains all the elements found in our body and that properly mixed with water, gives all his energy stored along with its contents in biophotonics. It also only two types of salt, which makes up 95% of the mine and which is nothing but rock salt "and the other is in the form of veins and has a crystalline form: the" salt crystal Rock. " Both are natural, contain the 84 elements mentioned above and therefore are much more valuable than industrial table salt. However, there is a difference Basic between the two: the pressure to which they have been subjected. And this is a very important circumstance. The reason is simple: the elements contained in rock salt have not received sufficient pressure are not embedded in the glass but are on the surface and in the spaces between the crystal structure. In contrast, salt rock crystal itself are. It is precisely this fact that guarantees the availability biochemistry of the elements to our cells. Consider that the pressure on the elements of a given structure which causes it to be organized in a colloidal state, something of paramount importance because our cells can only absorb what exists and colloidal organic way. That is why, for example, that our body can not absorb minerals in mineral water as being of a too thick for our cells can not metabolize.
In short, as the elements contained in rock salt have not received sufficient pressure and, therefore, not in colloidal its use is much lower than that of the salt crystal it has been exposed to enormous pressures during million years. Obviously, the higher the pressure has been more complete the crystal structure generated. Therefore, the crystal has a geometry and an organic composition perfect but no rock salt (Its elements are thicker by not receiving sufficient pressure to build a crystal structure).
And where is the salt crystal? Well, in the form of veins or lodes transparent white crystalline, pink or red in the mines, surrounded by rock salt. Veins, which generally involve 1% of all mine and should also extract manually-without mechanical means, not to alter its structure so that their exploitation has so far been limited to be unprofitable. Fortunately, this problem has been solved and both in Spain and other European countries have begun to market glass salt mines from the Himalayas. Good news because, according to experts, the Regular consumption can alleviate, if not cure, many diseases. It is sufficient to take
fasting every morning a small teaspoon of the salt solution-most two-mixed with mineral water. Given that it is not so much the quantity and frequency of intake. From a biochemical viewpoint, within minutes stimulates gastrointestinal activity (peristalsis) and that activation, in turn, stimulates the metabolism and digestion. In addition, restores electrolyte balance improving conductivity in our body thereby improving circulation. Moreover, as saline is an excellent way to achieve a balance between the acid and alkaline with its intake can remove heavy metals like mercury, lead, arsenic, amalgam and calcium deposits and the salt crystal is capable of breaking molecular bonds. In sum, the daily intake of salt crystal involves subjecting the body to a detoxification true to the book of limescale, heavy metals and other waste. And the preparation is simple: just take a bit of mineral water in the bottle is marketed as a salt crystal rocks and soon the water will become saline solution with the exact proportion of the 84 items listed . Leave it as it once saturated with salt crystals will not dissolve.


How To Make A Toy To Jackoff

the soybean crisis

[Nutrition]

vs Scientists. Industry of Soybean

Jane Phillimore discusses some of the points raised by
new research

Taken from Optimal Wellness center, which turn
plays it editing August 27, 2000 the Sunday Observer

Twelve years ago, I visited an alternative health practitioner for advice on some non-specific symptoms to health. I'd hardly sat down when I said that my diet needed radical attention. I had to give up all animal products, wheat, alcohol, and caffeine, and substitute protein in the form of soy milk and tofu. At present, this kind of advice is routine, but at the time seemed glamorously radical: I had to walk to the health food store in Clapham to stock soy milk because Sainsbury did not have its own brand (as they do now), and vegetable and soya sausages were just a glint in the eyes of Linda McCartney.

In experience, I lost so much weight and felt immensely rejuvenated. So much so that, four months later, I started eating normally again. Just as well, because now it has been found that soy, far from being the magical properties and health claims on which both the brigade insists alternative medicine can actually be harmful to you. The reputation of soy as a product which is generally anti-cancer, reduces cholesterol, osteoporosis-fighting, and has little fat is based on bad science and superlative marketing carried out by the powerful soy industry.

Worldwide, the evidence against soy is beginning to accumulate. In this country (the UK), MAFF is so worried about possible health problems caused by the phytoestrogens in soy that are funding a rolling program of 19 separate research projects, which must terminate in 2002. Preliminary findings by Professor John Ashby of AstraZeneca Central Toxicology Laboratory in Macclesfield, for example, confirm that soya infant formula (currently the sole food of 6,500 British babies) has an estrogenic effect in rats. According to public health minister Yvette Cooper, will not occur again on the soybean board until the COT (Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment), which is an independent committee has reviewed the findings of the program.

This could take several years. Meanwhile, if you've been seduced by the message that soy is the healthy of the 21st century, read on ...

Is Harmful Soybean for you?

Soy contains large amounts of various toxic chemicals, which can not be fully destroyed even with the long cooking process. These substances include phytates, which block the absorption of minerals by the body, enzyme inhibitors, which hinder the digestion of protein, and hemagglutinin, which causes red blood cells to clump together and inhibits oxygen asbsorción and growth. And what is most controversial of all, soy contains high levels of phytoestrogens (also known as isoflavones) genistein and daidzein, which mimic and sometimes block the hormone estrogen.

Surely, the Japanese eat soy in large quantities, and as a result have low rates of breast, uterus, colon, and prostate cancer?

That's the big myth on which it has built the idea of \u200b\u200bsoy health claim. In fact, the Japanese do not eat much soy: a study conducted in 1998 showed that a Japanese man typically eats about 8g (2 tsp) by day, nothing like the 220g (8oz) that a Westerner could put away by eating a big piece of tofu and two glasses of soy milk.

Second, although the Japanese may have lower rates of cancer in the reproductive organs, it is believed that this is due to other dietary and lifestyle: they eat less fatty meat, more fish and vegetables and less canned or processed in a typical Western diet. Thirdly, Asians have a much higher incidence of thyroid cancer and digestive diseases, including cancer of the stomach, pancreas, liver, and esophagus.

I'm vegetarian and large quantities of tofu and drink large amounts of soy milk. Should I stop?

Soy has become the meat and milk of vegetarians, being the main source of protein in your diet. But in fact, eating soy puts vegetarians at severe risk of mineral deficiencies, including calcium, copper, iron, magnesium and especially zinc. According to Dr. Mike Fitzpatrick, a New Zealand biochemist who has a web site about soy (see below), this is because soy contains high levels of acid phytate, which blocks the absorption of essential minerals in the digestive tract. To reduce the effects of a diet high in phytates, you need to eat, as the Japanese do, lots of meat or fish with tiny bits of soya.

not tolerate cow's milk. Should I take soy milk?

Soy has become the fashionable option for people who do not "tolerate" dairy animal. It is little known that soya is the second most common allergen. Only 1 percent of the population is truly allergic to cow's milk and of these, two thirds will also tolerate soy milk. In addition, soy milk has a high aluminum content. This is because the soy protein isolate which milk is manufactured acid-washed in aluminum tanks. No wonder it tastes bad.

Can soy affect thyroid?

For years, it has been known that phytoestrogens in soya depress thyroid function. In Japan, a survey conducted in 1991 showed that 30g of soya a day results in a huge increase in thyroid stimulating hormone. This can cause goitre, hypothyroidism, and thyroid disease autoimmune.

I'm pregnant. Should I avoid soy?

Probably, especially if you're vegetarian. A new study of babies born to vegetarian mothers showed that baby boys had triple the risk of hypospadias, a defect of the penis, which is present at birth. The researchers suggest this is due to greater exposure to phytoestrogen rich foods, especially soybeans. Inappropriate hormone levels such as those caused by a high intake of soy during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy may also harm the developing fetal brain.

But surely I can feed my baby soy formula? should be safe: it is available in every supermarket and pharmacy?

soy-fed babies are taking part in a 'grand experiment with human infants, an experiment that is still not controlled or monitored, "he said in 1998, Daniel Sheehan, director of the National Center for Toxicological Research of the FDA. The only food a newborn baby is the milk it drinks: a soy-fed baby receives the equivalent of five birth control pills estrogen every day, according to Mike Fitzpatrick. It was found that levels of isoflavones in these infants were between 13.000 and 22.000 times higher than those of babies fed with other products.

As a result of this phytoestrogen overload, soya-fed infants have twice the risk of developing thyroid abnormalities including goiter and autoimmune thyroiditis. Males are at risk of being delayed physical maturation, while girls risk early puberty (1 per cent of girls now show signs of puberty such as breast development or pubic hair before age three) and infertility. Researchers have also suggested that diabetes, changes in the central nervous system, extreme emotional behavior, asthma, immune system problems, pituitary insufficiency and IBS may be caused by a high phytoestrogen intake in early life.

Last year, the components of soy were also implicated in the development of childhood leukemia. Currently, the government (UK) advises that breast milk is best, and that soy formula should not given to infants unless on the advice of a health care professional.

Can soy help in the case of prostate cancer?

The former bond trader at high risego, Michael Milken certainly thinks so. He consumes 40g of soya protein every day for that purpose. The science is less conclusive. A recent study on Japanese-Americans living in Hawaii showed that men who ate two or more servings of tofu a week during middle age not only had 'accelerated brain aging', rising to more than double incidence of Alzheimer's disease and dementia, but also looked five years older than men who had not eaten.

My mother died of breast cancer, and I have advised medical sources, both mainstream and complementary, that increasing my soya intake may offer protection against the disease. Is this true?

The evidence is very inconclusive. In Diet Protection Against Breast Cancer, published last year, Dr Bob Arnot states that eating between 35g and 60g of soya protein daily protects breast cancer by increasing the intake of genistein, an estrogen blocker. But this ignores contrary evidence. In 1996, research showed that women who eat soy had a higher incidence of epithelial hyperplasia, a condition that presages malignancy. In 1997, also found that genistein in the diet stimulated human breast cells to enter the cell cycle. As a result, the researchers advised women not to eat soy products to prevent breast cancer.

But surely soy prevents osteoporosis, the bone thinning that particularly affects to post-menopausal women?

No. In fact, soy blocks calcium and causes a deficiency of vitamin D, needed for strong bones, say nutritionists and soya debunkers Sally Fallon and Mary G. Enig.

Is there some sort of soy product that I can eat safely?

Yes

fermented soy products like soy sauce, tempeh and miso. The long fermentation process counteracts the effects of natural toxins in soya.

"I can avoid soy?

is difficult. You can stop eating the obvious candidates such as soya milk and tofu, but soy is also found in breakfast cereals, ice cream, fast food like burgers, fish fingers and lasagne, and all kinds of baked goods from cakes and biscuits to tortillas and bread. If that's your mission in life, read labels carefully, and processed organic foods whenever possible.

Finally, those campaigning for soybeans always say that in the United States, a quarter of the population has been fed infant formula between 30 and 40 years with no adverse health problems. So, why should I care?

Scientists are only beginning to investigate and understand the harmful long-term effects that eating large amounts of soy can have on the human body. As Fallon and Enig write: "For years, industry has known that soy contains many toxins. At first they told the public that the toxins were removed by processing. Then they claimed that these substances were beneficial. It appears to be a great battle in the near future.

To

More information [English], enter the website
www.soyonlineservice.co.nz a detailed informal source of soy, and is managed by Dr. Mike Fitzpatrick.

However, a point in the article with which I disagree is the author's claim that only 1 percent of the population is allergic to cow's milk. While this may be true with respect to conventional methods of diagnosing allergies, the majority of the population suffers some degree of allergy or sensitivity to cow's milk, and would do better to avoid it altogether.

It would be best to avoid both cow's milk as "milk" of soybeans, and drink only water.

Welcome To Salon Letter

The food catastrophe

[Nutrition]

In early 2001 a representative survey showed that approximately 2.5 million Germans had become vegetarians. The reasons are obvious. The epidemic of BSE, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (known as mad cow disease) is just the first highlight of a wider scandal involving foodstuffs, who has stopped eating beef, he now realizes that no can still eat pork, because There are entire herds that have been drugged with antibiotics. German prosecutors have made many inquiries from veterinarians and farmers.

Some experts believe that antibiotics in our foods are equally or more dangerous than BSE prions. And who wants "change train" now eating fish flesh learns the results of a recent European Union study that fish in the North Sea and Baltic States are contaminated with dioxin, which is not surprising known following the poisoning of the seas. "So then it is better to use homemade carp and trout?. It would be great, but only if they were not fed with their counterparts in the North Sea and Baltic have been produced and processed into fishmeal. So will leaving only poultry. But neither of these recently excludes Federal Health Office in Germany the risk of transmitting BSE, even in the case of sheep and pigs. So is closing the vicious circle.

For years it has systematically hidden the fact that consumers are being subjected to a great experiment with foods that have many risk factors, pesticides and poisons of fungi in the variety of molds in the jam Baby, worms in fish, dioxin in hens, hormones in addition to BSE turbocorderos now everywhere. However, the deception, and expose consumers to many hazards continues with great activity.

Who even knows that about 75% of all food products in Germany pass through "process refinement" industrial?. For breakfast eggs have the proper yellow, mix the food of the hens with the corresponding dye. The pink color of salmon at sea is the result of food chemistry. The soups have nothing to do with a real soup, but are the result of a complicated technology. The pasta dough is yeast-based foam for spaghetti can be prepared more quickly. The aroma of peach yogurt is made of fungi and bacteria. Often waste products are used as basic material in the food industry, so for example the so-called albumin cake, which is in abundance in the production of chicken meat, and after being treated with sodium hydroxide just as a supplier of nutritional values \u200b\u200bin canned soups, or the leftovers from the preparation of the soybeans, which are mixed in the bread and vegetable fiber. A very typical culinary specialty is the seafood cocktail, which was stirred up, crushed and the remains of flavoring fishing, press in the form of squid or shrimp. Not only animal feeders have become the "dustbin of welfare society" (as Hubert Weiger of the Alliance for the Protection of Nature, Bund Naturschutz, Germany), but so are the plates of food while the men.

http://www.animanaturalis.org/

Suggest Some Group Names For College Mates

Soy - Consumers in the midst of deceit

[Nutrition]

Buján Silvana.


serious research has shown that soy, filed in the past times as the solution to the scourge of hunger, is far from being the "perfect food."

Soy consumption has a lot of press. It is presented as the solution to hunger. It is touted as the perfect food.
The harsh reality reveals it as a trap:
infants fed soy , can not absorb iron, calcium or zinc and hormonal system is imbalanced. Intellectual development will be smaller than other children. Pregnant women who consume soy as a base diet will have serious problems in the baby's hormonal system and themselves. And
adults we believed in the mirage of soy (GM or not) incorporate hormone doses and are exposed to very strong low allergy defenses and complications.

In truth, we are the victims of the need for multinationals to locate soy fed to livestock, the first world.
Behind the mirage of colorful posters, we are faced with the harsh reality: soy creates a deficiency of vitamin B1. phytic acid binds to minerals, preventing their absorption especially zinc, calcium and magnesium. Those who eat much soy are at risk for deficiencies of these minerals. Soy protein is a source of incomplete and unbalanced.

Soybeans have antithyroid properties. estrogenic isoflavones present in soy are known to be beneficial to health: The hard truth is that people who regularly consume soy products can suffer different thyroid imbalances. Animal studies isoflavones bind with goitre. Other studies have linked soy consumption not only hypothyroidism but also with low energy levels, poor absorption of minerals and infertility.
protein TVP is used as filler in spite of containing anti-nutrients. Both the soy and other protein isolates may cause a negative calcium balance in humans and contribute to causing osteoporosis.

milk Milk is not

Soy milk is used as a replacement for cow's milk and is promoted to the consumer
in infant formulas. Soy milk is not equivalent to human milk or the vaccine. And not only that the soy milk (so it should be called) has negative characteristics as food for infants and children: can modify their hormonal development.
baby Le incorporates substances that act as hormones, to the extent that the body feels to be receiving the equivalent of several conceptive pills a day, 2,000 estrogenic compounds concentration higher than human milk or milk powdered cow may cause premature development of breasts and sexual characteristics in girls , and possibility that the male organs do not develop normally in male puberty . In addition, no cholesterol, an essential substance for the proper development of brain and central nervous system of children. The soy lobby is very powerful because it gives the manufacturer of food and beverage economic filler.

soybean Why do we give up by the ears?

Argentina as record crop farmer can not feed its inhabitants. This is made possible by a perverse agricultural model introduced in the last decade and a half in which large transnational seed industry and agriculture dependent toxic brought the country to produce for export without value-added operation that does not translate into enough quality food to feed our population.

A production scheme shrinking labor force and degrades the environment to the extent of leaving barren.

In short, agriculture, as the Ecology Forum policy without farmers deforested forests and native forests, with expulsion of peasant communities, in their desire to extend the soya frontier regions not withstand many cycles without degrading culture

Almost all of the soybean crop is genetically modified, low-firms that sell the seed and the technology package the increasingly poor peasant, priced dollar.

Today, GM soya is touted to alleviate hunger. That soy in the first world is the food of cattle. It is a simple operation to open new markets for multinational sectors.

The Nutritionists Forum (Forum for Food and Nutrition Plan , under the auspices of UNICEF ) in July 2002, warned the national government (which had consulted with specialists from different institutions, including FAO ; UNICEF national universities, ministries INTA , Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría , Caritas, etc.) that
"As for the use of soy, it is recommended to point out what their real nutritional value, their appropriate use supplement as part of a varied and complete, and the recommendation not to name the soy-based beverage (juice) and "milk" (soy milk) because it does not replace in any way. (... ) is deficient in many nutrients, and its high phytate content interferes with the absorption of iron and zinc, nor is it a good source of calcium. (...) The use Soy should include environmental and social impact, the training requirements for proper use, the difficulty of its incorporation in the context of food culture and nutritional considerations that militate against use in children under 5 years and especially under 2 years. "
This was the advice he received the national government before launching the joint soybean :

Before hiding these realities and bring people to an impoverished diet and risky.
Before the country to curb the power of multinationals.
Legitimize Before that people eat food for livestock.

Wwe Diva Natalya's Boobs

Soy - Too good to be true

[Nutrition]

Finucan Brandon and Charlotte Gerson:

Although there was considerable research in 1966 on harmful substances in the soybean, today we would have great difficulty in finding articles that claim that soy is anything but a miracle food. By becoming more and more soy popular throughout industry and propaganda, we feel compelled again to raise our voices concerned.

Soybean Industry in the United States

In 1924, soybean production in the United States was only 1.8 million acres harvested, but for 1954, the number of acres harvested has increased to 18.9 million. Currently, U.S. soybean production is the third largest (in 1998 were harvested 72 million acres), providing more than 50 percent of global demand for soybeans.

Most of this production is used as animal feed and the manufacture of soybean oil to be used as vegetable oil, margarine, and butter. Traditional uses of soybean as food, only soy sauce is widely consumed in the American diet. Tofu, which represents 90 percent of the use of soybeans in Asia, has become more popular in the U.S., but soy is still nowhere near being a measurable component of the average American diet. Does it?

For over 20 years, the soy industry has concentrated on finding alternative uses and new markets for soybeans and soybean products. In the supermarket local, soy can now be found disguised as everything from cheese, milk, burgers and hot dogs, to cones, yogurt, vegetable oil, baby formula and flour (to name a few products). These are often marketed as low in fat and free of animal products or meat substitutes, high protein, vegetarian. But soy is not always mentioned at the top of the box. Currently, an alarming 60% of food on the shelves of supermarkets in the U.S. contain soy derivatives (ie soy flour, textured vegetable protein, hydrogenated soybean oil, soy protein isolate). When one examines the list of ingredients, and really look at the contents of the "Average American Diet," from fast food to snacks and pre-packaged frozen meals, soy plays a major role.

Where soybeans are wrong?

Here at the Gerson Institute, we believe that the positive aspects of the soybean are overshadowed by their potential to do harm. In fact, soybean contains a large number of hazardous substances. One among them is phytic acid, also called phytates. This organic acid is present in the bran or hulls of all seeds and legumes, but none have the high phytate content of soybeans has. These acids block the absorption of essential minerals like calcium, magnesium, iron and especially zinc. Besides the problem of high phytate content, the soybean is highly resistant to reduction techniques, such as long cooking over low heat.

Soybeans also contain potent enzyme inhibitors. These inhibitors block uptake of trypsin and other enzymes that the body needs for digestion of proteins. Normal cooking does not deactivate these "anti-nutrients" harmful that can cause serious stomach ailments and reduced protein digestion and can lead to chronic deficiencies in amino acid uptake.

Apart from these, the soybean also contains hemagglutinin, a substance that promotes clotting and causes red blood cells are clustered. These clustered erythrocytes can not properly absorb oxygen for distribution to the tissues of the body or keep the heart healthy. Both hemagglutinin and trypsin inhibitors are substances "depressing growth." Although the action of fermenting soy beans themselves off as inhibitors of trypsin and hemagglutinin, precipitation and cooking do not. Although the level of these enzyme inhibitors are reduced within precipitated soy products like tofu are not completely eliminated.

Only after a long period of fermentation (as in the formation of miso or tempeh) are reduced levels of phytate and "anti-nutrients, making the nutritional value is available to the human digestive system. High levels of harmful substances remaining in precipitated soy products leave their nutritional value questionable at a level best, and at least, a potentially damaging level.

And Out?

In recent years, there have been several studies regarding the effect of soybeans on human health. The results of these studies, mostly sponsored by various groups of the soybean industry, of course they were overwhelmingly in favor of soybeans. The main claims about the health benefits of soy are based purely on bad science. Although the main arguments in favor of cancer patients use soy focus on statistics showing low rates of breast, colon, and prostate cancer among Asian some obvious facts have been ignored completely. Although studies boast that Asian women have less breast cancer than American women, propaganda fail to note that these Asian women eat a diet that is dramatically different from that of their American counterparts.

Asian The normal diet consists of natural products, meat, less fat, more vegetables, more fish. Their diets are also lower in chemicals and toxins, they eat fewer processed foods (canned, packed in jars in brine, frozen). It is likely that these studies have been influenced by the fact that increased cancer rates among Asians who move to the United States and adopt Americanized diets. Of course, this change of diet goes hand in hand with a dramatic change in lifestyle. Ignoring the remarkable changes in diet and lifestyle, to assume that only low levels of soya these Americanized Asian diets is a major factor in higher rates of cancer and reveals a poor view, as stated above , a science wrong. Changes in diet and lifestyle should be taken into account in reaching the correct conclusion.

An article that has spread widely, written by Jane E. Allen, author of scientific articles for AP, and entitled: "Scientists Suggest More Soy in Diet", cites numerous speakers during a symposium, discussing the probable advantages of soy under the title "Impact of Soy Protein in Health. " However, the article says the symposium, which cost $ 50,000, "was sponsored by Protein Technologies International, St. Louis, a DuPont subsidiary that makes soy protein!" During the same symposium, Thomas Clarkson, a professor of comparative medicine at Wake Forest University, says: "The current hormone replacement therapy has been a dismal failure from the point of view of public health, "not because Premarin is known to cause cancer in the uterus or other female organs, but" because only 20 percent of women who could benefit from it are receiving it. "

Other popular arguments in support of soy state that fermented products like tempeh or natto, contain high levels of vitamin B-12. However, these supportive arguments fail to mention that the B-12 of soybean is a inactive analog B-12, which is not used as a vitamin in the human body. Some researchers speculate this analog may actually serve to prevent the body from absorbing the B-12. It is also descubrierto that allergic reactions to soybeans are much more common than all other vegetables. Until the American Academy of Pediatrics recognizes that exposure to soy at a young age through commercial infant formulas can be a major cause of soy allergies among older children and adults.

In his classic book, "A Cancer Therapy - Results of 50 Cases" (p. 237), the DDRA .. Gerson put "Soy and Soy Products" on the list of "forbidden" foods for Gerson Therapy patients. At that time, his greatest concerns were two items: the high oil content of soybeans and soy products, and rather high rate of allergic reactions to soy. Soybeans can add up to 9 grams of fat per serving, typically adding an average of 5 grams of fat per serving when part of the diet of the average American.

Extraction Process

processes that make "edible" soybeans are also the processes that make it "inedible". To ferment the soybean, the process involves the beans are pureed and saturated with an alkaline solution. Pureed mixture is then heated to approximately 115 º C (239 º F) in a pressure cooker. This process of warming and clipping destroys most of the anti-nutrients, but not all. At the same time, it has the serious disadvantage of denaturing the protein from the beans, so that it becomes very difficult to digest, and its effectiveness is greatly reduced.

Unfortunately, the alkaline solution also produces a carcinogen, the lisinealina, while reducing the cystine content in soybeans, and low in itself. Cystine plays an essential role in liver detoxification, allowing our bodies to filter and eliminate toxins. Without adequate amounts of cystine, protein complex the soybean becomes useless unless the diet is fortified with cystine-rich meat, eggs, or animal products - which is not an option for patients with Gerson.

In support of the soybean, I must say that it does contain large amounts of omega-3 fatty acids beneficial, but they are particularly likely to become rancid when subjected to high pressures and temperatures. Unfortunately, you need high pressure and temperature to extract oil from soybeans.

Before the soy bean is sent to your table, go through a rigorous process to strip them of their oil. First, apply hexane and other solvents to help separate the oil from the beans, leaving traces of these toxins in the commercial product. By definition, hexane is "any of five colorless hydrocarbons, volatile liquids (C 6 H 14) in the series of paraffins, and may not be beneficial at all to anyone's diet. After oil is extracted, the defatted flakes are used to form the three basic protein products. With the exception of soy flour that retains all fats, all soybean products contain trace amounts of carcinogenic solvents.

Experiences Personal

The following letter was received in November 1998: "I used soy milk for 12 years without any problem. As nine months ago, I started having heart palpitations. I thought I had reached menopause, but it was not. Add to my diet potassium and magnesium and vitamin E. But there was no change. I was taking decaffeinated coffee, but now I eliminated all sugar from my diet. I lost 25 pounds and I I felt extremely well, except for the palpitations. I tried hawthorn and garlic, but nothing helped. Recently, I fell into bed with bronchitis acute and could only drink water because even the soy milk caused me horrendous attacks of coughing. I noticed that after some days, heart palpitations had ceased. I did not give more importance because it never occurred to me that soya was the culprit. As soon as I started taking it again, my heart went crazy. The suspended for a week and then changed my brand. After 30 minutes of drinking only 4 ounces [soy milk], my heart was pounding. I noticed that you need 24 to 36 hours for my heart to stabilize. I wondered if your research had produced something like this in relation to soybeans. I know that is not within the definition of allergy, but something definitely is happening. I called the manufacturer of soy milk, but did not help me at all. I am very upset because I only drink soy milk and water. I also use soy milk to make protein shakes (with what else but soy protein).

In the November / December 1996 On our Gerson Healing Newsletter, we described another case: a pregnant woman who looked very sick and suffered from great mental retardation. She also described her son five years old, who suffered from many allergies and infections - both were using a considerable canntidad soy in your diet. I recommended to stop using all soy products. At that time, only I had found in that situation. But a year later, I came to the same area to give a lecture, and the lady invited me to lunch. Had been removed from your diet all soy products: her skin was now rosy, her cheeks were stuffed, their eyes sunken previously were now normal, dark circles were gone, and the health of their young son, who now had six years, was much improved.

Only last week, we noticed another interesting story. A patient at Gerson Certificate of Mexico City told us about his son, now 25, who suffered from a total absence of hair (alopecia), with the exception of eyebrows and eyelashes. She added that this started when he was only three years. Since the mother asked me about this situation, I thought for a moment the problem. Then, looking at both parents, who have normal hair, I thought the boy's problem was probably not genetic. So I asked the mother if she used a lot of soy. She said no. But then, after thinking about the question for a moment, said that when the boy was about a year, had many allergies, so she regularly fed him soy milk! I explained the ability of soy block enzymes and nutrients, and the likelihood that soy milk was the cause of the alopecia had begun three years. As we had just witnessed the case of a patient whose hair had grown back over his skull after being bald naked for about 20 years, he cautiously suggested that a complete change of diet, accompanied by intense detoxification, could correct the problem.

COMMENT: This is an excellent summary of some of the main reasons why soy is not the healthy food you think it is. There are literally billions of dollars to influence the edible oil industry, which are promoting the use of soy in natural medicine circles for so their use can be promoted among the medical public at large. They can even fool natural medical doctors who are knowledgeable. I am a monthly columnist in the publication Townsend Letters, and another columnist, Dr. Hudson, who was declared by vote of the year naturopathic physician, this month published an article praising the values \u200b\u200bof soybeans. Needless to say, quickly wrote a letter asking them to publish Townsend the other side of the story of the soybean. Meanwhile, you can be prevented and your family avoid potential problems by limiting any use of fermented soy products only, like tempeh or miso.

not Believe the Propaganda!

Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM) is one of the leading manufacturers of soy products. He's trying to get the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognize the category of generally recognized as safe (GRAS, for its acronym in English) for isoflavones, estrogen-like compounds found in products Soy. The company presented a paper entitled "Information Paper that examines the safety of soy isoflavones used in specific dietary applications."

Dr. Mike Fitzpatrick, a biochemist and former professor at the University of Auckland, this material carefully analyzed and presented its findings in an article titled "Soy Isoflavones: Panacea or Poison", which was published in the Journal of the Price-Pottinger Nutrition Foundation (vol. 22, no. 3). Dr. Fitzpatrick concluded that the support of ADM document containing "factual errors, misrepresents cited authors and does not present the totality of the evidence scientific ".

ADM states that" these isoflavones have been consumed by millions of human beings for more than two thousand years. "Indeed, although they have been used in Asia for hundreds of years," there were an important part of the diet [the Asian]. "In addition, Fitzpatrick notes," traditional soybeans was quite different from what we know today. "The wild soybean, the soybean Glycine," is the species traditionally consumed, and the ancestor of modern culture, Glycine max, "said Fitzpatrick. The modern species has been cultivated to produce much more protein than traditional soybeans.

Isoflavones act as "defensive mechanism in response to pests. A consistent goal of soybean growers has been a greater resistance to disease, and it is quite conceivable that this goal has served to increase the levels of isoflavones and other toxins that occur naturally in Glycine max. The levels of isoflavones in Glycine max vary considerably. "If this is so, then it is unlikely that the traditional Asian soybean, Glycine, contain very low levels of isoflavones or perhaps none at all," says Fitzpatrick. Therefore, ADM's assertion that the soybean has been consumed for more than two thousand years can not be justify.

Soy and Infant Formula

What is particularly worrying is the presence of soy in infant formulas. It is interesting to note that many children do not tolerate soy formulas, which seem to be "allergic" to soy.

Perhaps the body instinctively rejects the enzyme inhibitors found in soybeans. In a letter to Linda Kahl in the Division of Product Policy of the FDA, and dated April 22, 1998, Daniel Sheehan, Ph.D. and director of the Estrogen Base Program National Center for Toxicological Research, wrote: "There is abundant evidence that some isoflavones, including genistein, are toxic. Additionally, isoflavones are inhibitors of thyroid peroxidase, which makes the [hormone] T3 and T4. can be expected inhibition generate thyroid abnormalities including goiter and autoimmune thyroiditis. In fact, children who consume soy formulas rich in isoflavones have about twice the risk of contracting these diseases ... While isoflavones may have beneficial effects at some ages or in certain circumstances, can not be assumed that this is true for all ages. Isoflavones are like other estrogens they are two-edged swords, conferring both benefits and therefore risks.

Dr. Sheehan believes that: "The addition of isoflavones in foods should be considered in the same way that adding estrogen to the food, which is a bad idea." Dr. Sheehan is very concerned about the high levels of estrogen in soy-based formulas. Thinks that children fed with these formulas have been put at risk in an experiment with children, which is a large scale, uncontrolled and basically unmonitored. " Dr. Fitzpatrick brings up another point at issue: he believes that soy can be combined with other xenoestrogens (such as pesticides). Fitzpatrick writes that "because of the potential to cause synergistic effects of human exposure to all endocrine disruptors, such as soybeans, is urgently needed that isoflavones are reduced."

Soy and the Western Diet

Part of this article, we mentioned that assumptions have been made linking soy intake with low incidence of certain cancers in Asia. "However, an epidemiological study in China has shown that a high intake of soy protects against breast cancer." 1

Conveniently, Soy proponents have ignored a study showing that high levels of genistein may stimulate breast cells to enter the cell cycle. " 2 These findings are "consistent with a previous report Petrakis et al , expressing the concern that women fed soy protein isolate have a higher incidence of epithelial hyperplasia." 3

Recently, the British government published its discovery of the effects of soy in the diet, concluding that "almost no evidence linking the health benefits of foods containing isoflavones with isoflavones themselves. " 4

Another study concluded that" any benefits of soy products are not due to isoflavones specifically ... [And] the combination of a high intake of phytoestrogens in a Western diet may not be beneficial. " 5

natural addition to problems with soybeans, we face a new Western phenomenon: genetically altered soybeans . Among other genetically altered foods, or GMOs, such as corn, apples, tomatoes, pumpkins, strawberries, lettuce, potatoes, wheat, and even walnuts (to name a few), soy is one of the most controversial. Monsanto, a leading biotech billionaire who brought us rBGH (bovine growth hormone), has been struggling for several years to bring to the table you genetically altered foods. So far, is winning. The truth is that unless you have been eating only organic foods, is likely to have been testing the work of Monsanto.

Monsanto has gained millions in profits from sales of its popular herbicide, RoundupÆ, and in turn has produced several transgenic crops resist it. Of course, the soybean crop is among those Roundup-ReadyÆ. Being resistant to the potent herbicide, farmers can spray more of it on their crops, resulting in higher levels of toxins in the harvested product. Recent studies have shown that soybean crops have a high estrogen level (much higher than the already high levels of soybeans). As mentioned earlier, the synergistic effect of these estrogens - especially in children ingiiereen soy-based formulas - is unknown, but some eyebrows hoop made in a recent study published in the journal Pediatrics.

The researchers found that one percent of all girls now showing signs of puberty such as breast development or pubic hair before age three, to the age of eight years, 14.7 for Caucasian girls and a huge 48.3 percent of African American girls had one of those features or both, "says Sally Fallon in the article on soy published by Price-Pottinger.

been shown that these higher estrogen levels increase the amount of fat produced in the milk of cows fed with altered beans and sprayed. Along with the use of rBGH, high estrogen levels cast doubt on whether the milk of cows may actually be called milk.

The European Union has struggled desperately to keep genetically engineered crops entering the European food chain, but this June, both France and Ireland will be planting the first crops alteradosen European soil. In the United States, there are very few laws (if any) on the biotechnology industry.

Soy Protein Intake and

Soybeans is not the basis for measuring whether a vegetarian diet or not to provide protein and nutrients your body needs. In fact, a diet completely devoid soy or meat products but rich in fruits and vegetables gives your body all the protein and nutrients they need. The important factor in determining whether a vegetarian diet free of soy is good enough for you or not, it is a careful combination food. Is calories. While you eat enough greens, fruits, and vegetables, your body will get everything you need. This is the reason why the Gerson therapy, with its well-balanced plant-based diet (soy-free), and rich in vitamins and enzymes, can effectively treat even the most difficult ailments.

Concealer Oil Free Non Comedogenic

Against dairy

[Nutrition]

"Against Milk Products" by Harvey and Marilyn Diamond.

perpetuate the ridiculous belief that we can not meet our protein needs without eating animal products is pure distortion and commercialism.

I would love to see those who disagree chasing a rabbit, tearing with teeth and hands (if they could catch it) and devour it raw, blood, guts, bones, skin and meat, as would a true carnivore that respect. And after giving the rabbit story, I would like to see them go to a pasture, put on all fours and suck the milk from the udder of a cow, to bring down the rabbit. That is also a little repulsive, right? Why? Because it is our natural inclination. If I did not the mother's breasts, is it too late? The fact is that most people react to the sick cow's milk. Go to another species to get milk is an insult to the magnificent project of nature.

It's really amazing that people always try to figure out a way to do things opposite to what is natural, and to justify always resort to half-truths. For example in America there are large billboards and full page ads in magazines that show different milk products with the legend that says: "Calcium in the manner specified by nature." They have forgotten to add two very important words: " For calves! "Calcio: as advised by nature for the calves! Cow's milk is for calves! Why is it so difficult to understand that? Once weaned, even a calf will drink milk ... or her own class or any other animal. He has an innate intelligence to not interfere in the grand scheme of nature. Too bad we lack the intelligence!

Nature is too wonderful and perfect for us to have the arrogance and audacity to dare to try to outsmart it. There is a reason that all mammals have milk when their children are born, and the milk of each species is beneficial only for the species. Such is the nature! So there are two things common to all mammals on earth, except us:

1. Do not consume the milk of another species. That would overextend their biological adaptation, and would not so. (Remember that we are not talking pets or kept in zoos, which have managed to pervert as much as ourselves.)

2. Once weaned, no animal ever drink milk again. This is food designed by nature to feed the young of the species. Designed specifically for rapid growth of a baby. That is their goal! It's stupid to insist that we continue taking it after the children, until we are octogenarians, if we live that long. Is ridiculous and regrettable. Should we really believe that, once our mothers breastfeeding, have to replace them cows?

How is it that the species with the most sophisticated brain, the greater intelligence and the unique ability of reasoning is too stupid to see this simple truth? And then there's the ironic fact that dairy products cause disease. Are harmful, cause suffering, are what one should eat if you have poor health and illness. Dietitians and nutrition experts, who are the spokesmen and the dairy industry jaleadores and tell us that these products are a good food, they should hide their heads in shame, not only to convince the innocent public that dairy products are really valuable but also not a day to stay informed in the field they are supposed to know something.

say that dairy products are a good food for humans is a proof of unpardonable ignorance of the facts. It is too evident that dairy products are a clear and present danger. I can understand this misconception in those outside the field of health, but for a professional, who will turn for reliable advice, tricking people out of laziness, ignorance, pride or economic benefits, or all of the rather, it is despicable. It is a criminal outrage liquidate the health of the population to get rich. And, you see, the evidence are now coming to light, but has been known for decades as harmful are dairy products. I have already provided data on diseases that can cause animal products high in fat and cholesterol (including dairy products). And there is much evidence, confirmed by common sense and scientific literature.

Cow's milk is used to raise a large animal, large-boned, with four stomachs, and in no way we respond to these criteria (although, unfortunately, I've seen some people start to have a dangerous aspect bovine). Think of cow's milk is designed to make A calf weighing 40 kilos at birth, despite reaching 900 kilos in just two years. Human children tend to weigh between 2, 7 and 4 kilos at birth and reach a weight of only 45 to 90 kilos in 18 years. Eating dairy products is to eat a food designed by nature to make it very big, like a cow, very quickly. If you currently eat dairy products, I hope that is not trying to lose weight. It will be easier than trying to extinguish a fire by throwing gasoline. But many other dairy products are harmful aspects, I do not know where to start.

milk cow produces more mucus than any other food, a thick mucus, thick, which seals around the body's respiratory system, mucus that lines the inside of the body and prevents it from functioning smoothly, a thick mucus, sticky , which makes a huge way eliminative powers of the body, clogs the delicate mucous membranes and invites disease. Hay fever, asthma, bronchitis, sinusitis, colds, runny noses and ear infections are due mainly to dairy products. Here are the main cause of allergies. Virtually every book, report and study on dairy mention allergies. There is no doubt intervention they have in that kind of conditions.

addition to many other sources, two of the best-qualified researchers in the field of dairy products, say the existence of such adverse effects. Both are doctors and have impressive credentials. Dr. William A. Ellis, almost an octogenarian, has researched the effects of dairy products for forty years, Dr. NW Walker, author of eight books, did research on nutrition and health for eighty years and died peacefully in 1985 of natural causes at the age of 109 years. These two learned gentlemen have done the most derogatory statements dairy products. Have also reported that cause heart disease and severe chest pains. As noted by Dr. Ellis, the last two centuries is known that cheese is one of the main factors that cause headaches. A study published in the journal Nature on July 6, 1974, shows that a protein found in many kinds of cheese are responsible for migraines. I've seen hundreds of people who stopped getting headaches after stopped taking dairy products or simply reducing their intake.

Do you have children? Has your child ever had an ear infection? Given that the medical profession and dieticians consider them a normal part of childhood, would not surprise me to answer no. If your child has or had ear infections, there are many opportunities to take dairy products, special milk bottle or both. For seventeen years, I have not yet seen a single child with ear infections that do not take dairy products. Here's how you can verify what I say and at the same time avoid further suffering to her son: eliminate all dairy from your diet, or reduce them greatly, and see what happens. After an initial period during which the child can still have a runny nose and perhaps another ear infection while the body clears the residual mucus, runny cease altogether and there will be no more ear infections. We have seen this hundreds of times. The body of a child reacts very quickly to positive changes. Stuffy noses and ears that are painful to induce tears are not normal.

course, you are concerned about calcium intake. We have handled carefully and have invested billions to have that reaction. Do not worry. Then I will discuss this issue and mitigaré their fears. The fear is exactly what we wield against you to make you eat dairy products. Think about it. What better advertising trick of you to think that, without a specific product will suffer deficiencies, pain, discomfort? Fear is an effective ploy has been used for decades to make people act a certain way to achieve a desired result. Most often, the result is bad for your health but good for business.

Here is an example. During the twenties, when widespread vaccination against smallpox, some people chose not to get vaccinated or allow their children vaccinated because of the number of deaths caused vaccines (something like the failure of the flu). Thus, we used the best strategy known fear. (...)

Remember that dairy products are rich in cholesterol and fat and no fiber, a bad combination, as that match all who have a basic knowledge of nutrition. It is strange that dietitians and nutrition experts obstinate praising both dairy products, knowing that foods high in fat and low in fiber are counterproductive. What more proof do you need? At the end of the day, what needs who are trying to satisfy?

Despite overwhelming scientific fact, basic common sense and logic, the dairy industry advertising and solicitations of dietitians and nutritional experts hired by the conviction that we have food for calves is essential to human survival.

In dairy products there are two elements to be decomposed by enzymes in the body: the lactose and casein. Lactose breaks down the enzyme lactase, while in charge of decomposing casein is renin. To the three or four years there renin in the human digestive tract, and so is lactase, except in a very small number of people. The term intolerance Lactose is handled as if it were a strange fact that sometimes manifests itself, but the truth is that over 98% of the population is lactose intolerant because they lack lactase. But instead of recognizing this as a proud part of the plan of nature and stop the intake of foods that require lactase (all dairy products), pharmaceutical companies take advantage of the fact and begin to advertise that you can chemicals take to help break down lactose. As if the public no longer getting enough drugs (MORE THAN 25 MILLION PILLS EVERY TIME) must produce more to help move something inside of our body, first, not even have to be there. Mother Nature does all in its power to help us recognize that fact.

Casein is the protein component of milk. Is a substance very thick, coarse, used for one of the strongest wood glues known. Does anyone fancy a sandwich glue? Cow's milk contains 300% more casein than human milk. By-products of bacterial decomposition of casein end up as a thick mucus, like a rope, which sticks to the mucous membranes and we stuck the body. The human body lacks any mechanisms digestive necessary to decompose. Earlier we referred to Dr. NW Walker, recognized worldwide as an authority on this subject and an expert on the glandular system. His studies convinced him that the throat goiter and other thyroid disorders were the direct result of casein from cow's milk, and specifically noted that the problem is complicated to a considerable extent when dairy products are pasteurized .

for years has advised patients to consume milk sores to relieve pain. Natural hygienists expressed from the start position contrary to his advice as absurd, for they knew The acid forming foods were the worst that could be supplied to an ulcer patient, and all dairy products except butter, are acid forming. Natural hygienists were the first to receive the attacks of the elite with the credentials of "experts" in health, but if you ask doctors or dieticians of today will now agree with them hygienists to those previously attacked . Dairy products aggravate ulcers.

Ulcerative colitis is another very painful and uncomfortable condition. It is often a precursor to colon cancer. Dairy products not only help colitis, but that removing these products from the diet results in a dramatic improvement of colitis. And, as we said before, dairy products, along with all other high protein foods are one of the main triggers colon cancer

A recent study in Italy indicates that mortality Because prostate cancer is 60% higher in the north than in the south. It was considered that frequent consumption of milk and cheese was a risk factor.

syndrome sudden infant death (SIDS) is a tragedy especially atrocious. An innocent baby gurgles and smiles and a moment later he is dead. It is true that SIDS can be attributed to any other cause, but it is unquestionable that dairy products are partly responsible. I am aware that this information does not make them happy because mothers of SIDS, but the evidence is irrefutable and must be taken into account.

In fact, the list of ailments that can be linked to dairy products is so extensive that there is hardly a health problem, at least not contributing. A book that presents an indictment of the most compelling and comprehensive to dairy products is Do not Drink Your Milk, Oski and Bell. Among the multitude of diseases and health problems that the authors attributed to dairy products include The Gehrig's disease and multiple sclerosis. The latter is more abundant in areas of the world where children are raised more dairy products to the breast. A diet low in animal fat, used for thirty years by a physician University of Oregon has helped in spectacular fashion to patients with multiple sclerosis.

If not for modern technology, all mammals are confined to feed their children and Once weaned, they all remain with foods that are adapted biologically. In the wild, drinking milk is not a problem for any mammal, only it is for the only mammal too "smart" to trust the plan of nature. Naturally, a big business cares about its benefits and does what he can to perpetuate the myth that cow's milk is a food fit for humans.

Before he arrived to become a nutrition consultant reimbursement National Company Dairy Products Professor EV McCollum stressed the fact that milk is not an essential element in the human diet. (See previous editions of his book The Newer Knowledge of Nutrition). He noted that people in South Asia never drink milk. Their diet consists of rice, soybeans, sweet potatoes, bamboo shoots and other vegetables. According to Professor MacCollum, these people are exceptional in their physical development and endurance, and ability to work is unusual. They do not suffer bone defects in children and have the best teeth in the world. This compares favorably with intense and people drinking milk. Unfortunately, the teacher seemed desirable to eliminate these made of all editions of his work published after his admission as an advisor to Company National Dairy . The truth must be removed when it threatens profits and wages. This is the sad truth of life in America. Once again, you sacrifice the health of the people by the almighty dollar.

Well, take enough to drink milk as others, but also a few millennia we live in the state. The same is not so bad, right?